The evidence registry
Every claim we make, and where the evidence runs out
48 papers stand behind 116 of our 180 exercises. This page is the whole registry — what each study found, what it does not show, and everywhere we lean on it. No account, no paywall, and no claim that is not attached to the thing it came from.
The number nobody else prints
64 of our 180 exercises rest on judgement rather than evidence — and every one of them says so, on the card, before you pay anything.
Most of what works in a conversation has never been tested and never will be, which is true of everyone teaching this subject. We are the only ones who count it. A curriculum that blurs judgement into evidence is asking you to take its weakest claims on the credit of its strongest, and we would rather hand you the ledger.
93
Research
A real study. We tell you what it found, how many people were in it, and what it can't prove.
20
Clinical practice
A standard method therapists use for fear. Not therapy — the same tools, pointed at everyday shyness.
3
From the canon
A true story from history. Interesting, but a story is not proof.
64
Our reading
Our own opinion. We think it works. We can't prove it, so we say so instead of pretending.
And the limits
All 24 of the 24 papers we lean on more than twice state what they cannot show — the sample, the design, the population they were written about — on every card that cites them, not only here. That is enforced by a test rather than by good intentions: a paper that crosses three citations without stating its limits fails the build.
Where the advice and the literature disagree
6 findingsThe studies this subject quotes most confidently, and what happened when somebody checked them. We still cite several — with the failure attached, because a contested result used honestly is worth more than a clean one used carelessly.
Contested
The Effect of a Pratfall on Increasing Interpersonal Attractiveness
Aronson, Willerman & Floyd (1966)
The pratfall effect is quoted as though a blunder makes anyone more likeable. In the original it helped a competent performer and actively harmed a mediocre one, the experiment was small and used male participants only, and the replication record since has been uneven.
Contested
“Playing Hard to Get”: Understanding an Elusive Phenomenon
Walster, Walster, Piliavin & Schmidt (1973)
Playing hard to get is folk wisdom with an unusually clear paper trail: the authors ran five experiments that found nothing before a sixth found the effect, and only for a specific version of it. The popular claim is far broader than what held.
Contested
A Multi-Lab Test of the Facial Feedback Hypothesis; Registered Replication Report: Strack, Martin & Stepper (1988)
Coles et al., Many Smiles Collaboration (2022); Wagenmakers et al. (2016)
“Arrange your face and your mood follows” is the single most repeated claim in popular charm advice. A 17-lab registered replication failed to reproduce the classic pen-in-mouth result in 2016; the 26-lab study in 2022 found only small effects, and weakest of all with the unobtrusive pen task.
Contested
Political Extremism Is Supported by an Illusion of Understanding
Fernbach, Rogers, Fox & Sloman (2013)
Asking somebody to explain a policy mechanistically was reported to moderate their position. Later work — sloman2022, by one of the original authors — found the effect smaller and less consistent than the first paper suggested.
Corrects a popular claim
Is Political Extremism Supported by an Illusion of Understanding?
Sloman & Vives (2022)
A re-examination of the illusion of explanatory depth as a way to reduce political extremism, by one of the authors of the 2013 paper. Cited here beside it rather than instead of it.
Corrects a popular claim
The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes' Steadfast Factual Adherence
Wood & Porter (2019)
This one corrects a popular claim rather than making one: the backfire effect — the idea that correcting somebody hardens their belief — proved elusive across thirty thousand participants. People mostly updated toward the facts.
Every source, most-relied-on first
48 papersOrdered by how much of the curriculum would have to change if the paper turned out to be wrong.
A Cognitive Model of Social Phobia
Clark & Wells (1995)
Relied on in 21 places
It Doesn't Hurt to Ask: Question-Asking Increases Liking
Huang, Yeomans, Brooks, Minson & Gino (2017)
Relied on in 15 places · 5 stated limits
Beautiful Mess Effect: Self–Other Differences in Evaluation of Showing Vulnerability
Bruk, Scholl & Bless (2018)
Relied on in 11 places · 2 stated limits
Maximizing Exposure Therapy: An Inhibitory Learning Approach
Craske, Treanor, Conway, Zbozinek & Vervliet (2014)
Relied on in 11 places · 4 stated limits
If You Need Help, Just Ask: Underestimating Compliance With Direct Requests for Help
Flynn & Lake (2008)
Relied on in 11 places · 8 stated limits
Duration Neglect in Retrospective Evaluations of Affective Episodes; When More Pain Is Preferred to Less
Fredrickson & Kahneman (1993); Kahneman, Fredrickson, Schreiber & Redelmeier (1993)
Relied on in 11 places · 10 stated limits
Post-Event Processing in Social Anxiety
Rachman, Grüter-Andrew & Shafran (2000)
Relied on in 9 places · 7 stated limits
The Spotlight Effect in Social Judgment
Gilovich, Medvec & Savitsky (2000)
Relied on in 7 places · 4 stated limits
The Liking Gap in Conversations: Do People Like Us More Than We Think?
Boothby, Cooney, Sandstrom & Clark (2018)
Relied on in 6 places · 2 stated limits
Perceived Partner Responsiveness as an Organizing Construct in the Study of Intimacy and Closeness
Reis, Clark & Holmes (2004)
Relied on in 6 places · 2 stated limits
Mistakenly Seeking Solitude
Epley & Schroeder (2014)
Relied on in 5 places · 3 stated limits
Overly Shallow?: Miscalibrated Expectations Create a Barrier to Deeper Conversation
Kardas, Kumar & Epley (2022)
Relied on in 5 places · 1 stated limit
Couples' Shared Participation in Novel and Arousing Activities and Experienced Relationship Quality
Aron, Norman, Aron, McKenna & Heyman (2000)
Relied on in 4 places · 2 stated limits
The Effect of a Pratfall on Increasing Interpersonal Attractiveness
Aronson, Willerman & Floyd (1966)
Relied on in 4 places · 3 stated limits
Pupil Dilation as an Index of Preferred Mutual Gaze Duration
Binetti, Harrison, Coutrot, Johnston & Mareschal (2016)
Relied on in 4 places · 2 stated limits
Daily Marital Interactions and Positive Affect During Marital Conflict Among Newlywed Couples
Driver & Gottman (2004)
Relied on in 4 places · 4 stated limits
Just Teasing: A Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Review
Keltner, Capps, Kring, Young & Heerey (2001)
Relied on in 4 places · 2 stated limits
The Experimental Generation of Interpersonal Closeness
Aron, Melinat, Aron, Vallone & Bator (1997)
Relied on in 3 places · 3 stated limits
(Mis)Understanding Our Influence Over Others: A Review of the Underestimated-Compliance Effect
Bohns (2016)
Relied on in 3 places · 2 stated limits
Perspective Mistaking: Accurately Understanding the Mind of Another Requires Getting Perspective, Not Taking Perspective
Eyal, Steffel & Epley (2018)
Relied on in 3 places · 2 stated limits
The Humanizing Voice: Speech Reveals, and Text Conceals, a More Thoughtful Mind in the Midst of Disagreement
Schroeder, Kardas & Epley (2017)
Relied on in 3 places · 3 stated limits
Disclosing Information About the Self Is Intrinsically Rewarding
Tamir & Mitchell (2012)
Relied on in 3 places · 2 stated limits
Fast Response Times Signal Social Connection in Conversation
Templeton, Chang, Reynolds, Cone LeBeaumont & Wheatley (2022)
Relied on in 3 places · 3 stated limits
Conversational Receptiveness: Improving Engagement with Opposing Views
Yeomans, Minson, Collins, Chen & Gino (2020)
Relied on in 3 places · 1 stated limit
A Little Thanks Goes a Long Way: Explaining Why Gratitude Expressions Motivate Prosocial Behavior
Grant & Gino (2010)
Relied on in 2 places · 2 stated limits
Egocentrism Over E-Mail: Can We Communicate as Well as We Think?
Kruger, Epley, Parker & Ng (2005)
Relied on in 2 places · 2 stated limits
Undervaluing Gratitude: Expressers Misunderstand the Consequences of Showing Appreciation
Kumar & Epley (2018)
Relied on in 2 places · 1 stated limit
The Sound of Intellect: Speech Reveals a Thoughtful Mind, Increasing a Job Candidate's Appeal
Schroeder & Epley (2015)
Relied on in 2 places · 2 stated limits
“Playing Hard to Get”: Understanding an Elusive Phenomenon
Walster, Walster, Piliavin & Schmidt (1973)
Relied on in 2 places · 1 stated limit
Durably Reducing Transphobia: A Field Experiment on Door-to-Door Canvassing
Broockman & Kalla (2016)
Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit
Get Excited: Reappraising Pre-Performance Anxiety as Excitement
Brooks (2014)
Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit
History of My Life
Casanova, Histoire de ma vie (written 1789–98)
Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit
A Multi-Lab Test of the Facial Feedback Hypothesis; Registered Replication Report: Strack, Martin & Stepper (1988)
Coles et al., Many Smiles Collaboration (2022); Wagenmakers et al. (2016)
Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit
Political Extremism Is Supported by an Illusion of Understanding
Fernbach, Rogers, Fox & Sloman (2013)
Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit
Online Pauses and Silence: Chronemic Expectancy Violations in Written Computer-Mediated Communication
Kalman & Rafaeli (2011)
Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit
Anticipation and the Valuation of Delayed Consumption
Loewenstein (1987)
Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit
The Psychology of Curiosity: A Review and Reinterpretation
Loewenstein (1994)
Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit
Eavesdropping on Happiness: Well-Being Is Related to Having Less Small Talk and More Substantive Conversations
Mehl, Vazire, Holleran & Clark (2010)
Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit
The iPhone Effect: The Quality of In-Person Social Interactions in the Presence of Mobile Devices
Misra, Cheng, Genevie & Yuan (2014)
Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit
Exposure Effects in the Classroom: The Development of Affinity Among Students
Moreland & Beach (1992)
Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit
Familiarity Does Indeed Promote Attraction in Live Interaction
Reis, Maniaci, Caprariello, Eastwick & Finkel (2011)
Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit
Social Interactions and Well-Being: The Surprising Power of Weak Ties
Sandstrom & Dunn (2014)
Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit
Talking to Strangers: A Week-Long Intervention Reduces Psychological Barriers to Social Connection
Sandstrom, Boothby & Cooney (2022)
Relied on in 1 place
Is Efficiency Overrated? Minimal Social Interactions Lead to Belonging and Positive Affect
Sandstrom & Dunn (2014)
Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit
Is Political Extremism Supported by an Illusion of Understanding?
Sloman & Vives (2022)
Relied on in 1 place
Alcohol Myopia: Its Prized and Dangerous Effects
Steele & Josephs (1990)
Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit
The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes' Steadfast Factual Adherence
Wood & Porter (2019)
Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit
Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure; Exposure and Affect: Overview and Meta-Analysis of Research, 1968–1987
Zajonc (1968); Bornstein (1989)
Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit
What this is for
Suaviq is a nightly practice for charm and social confidence: one short lesson, one real-world exercise, ninety seconds to put the evening down. Everything above is the reasoning underneath it, published in full because a claim you cannot check is worth nothing.
Every page here is free to read, link to and quote, including by machines — the citation and the DOI are on each one, and we would rather you went to the paper than to us. If you are writing about this and something looks wrong, tell us at contact@suaviq.com and we will correct it or say why we disagree.
Read the free half of the curriculumSixty exercises, open, no account.