SUAVIQNight one

The evidence registry

Every claim we make, and where the evidence runs out

48 papers stand behind 116 of our 180 exercises. This page is the whole registry — what each study found, what it does not show, and everywhere we lean on it. No account, no paywall, and no claim that is not attached to the thing it came from.

The number nobody else prints

64 of our 180 exercises rest on judgement rather than evidence — and every one of them says so, on the card, before you pay anything.

Most of what works in a conversation has never been tested and never will be, which is true of everyone teaching this subject. We are the only ones who count it. A curriculum that blurs judgement into evidence is asking you to take its weakest claims on the credit of its strongest, and we would rather hand you the ledger.

93

Research

A real study. We tell you what it found, how many people were in it, and what it can't prove.

20

Clinical practice

A standard method therapists use for fear. Not therapy — the same tools, pointed at everyday shyness.

3

From the canon

A true story from history. Interesting, but a story is not proof.

64

Our reading

Our own opinion. We think it works. We can't prove it, so we say so instead of pretending.

And the limits

All 24 of the 24 papers we lean on more than twice state what they cannot show — the sample, the design, the population they were written about — on every card that cites them, not only here. That is enforced by a test rather than by good intentions: a paper that crosses three citations without stating its limits fails the build.

Where the advice and the literature disagree

6 findings

The studies this subject quotes most confidently, and what happened when somebody checked them. We still cite several — with the failure attached, because a contested result used honestly is worth more than a clean one used carelessly.

Contested

The Effect of a Pratfall on Increasing Interpersonal Attractiveness

Aronson, Willerman & Floyd (1966)

The pratfall effect is quoted as though a blunder makes anyone more likeable. In the original it helped a competent performer and actively harmed a mediocre one, the experiment was small and used male participants only, and the replication record since has been uneven.

Contested

“Playing Hard to Get”: Understanding an Elusive Phenomenon

Walster, Walster, Piliavin & Schmidt (1973)

Playing hard to get is folk wisdom with an unusually clear paper trail: the authors ran five experiments that found nothing before a sixth found the effect, and only for a specific version of it. The popular claim is far broader than what held.

Contested

A Multi-Lab Test of the Facial Feedback Hypothesis; Registered Replication Report: Strack, Martin & Stepper (1988)

Coles et al., Many Smiles Collaboration (2022); Wagenmakers et al. (2016)

“Arrange your face and your mood follows” is the single most repeated claim in popular charm advice. A 17-lab registered replication failed to reproduce the classic pen-in-mouth result in 2016; the 26-lab study in 2022 found only small effects, and weakest of all with the unobtrusive pen task.

Contested

Political Extremism Is Supported by an Illusion of Understanding

Fernbach, Rogers, Fox & Sloman (2013)

Asking somebody to explain a policy mechanistically was reported to moderate their position. Later work — sloman2022, by one of the original authors — found the effect smaller and less consistent than the first paper suggested.

Corrects a popular claim

Is Political Extremism Supported by an Illusion of Understanding?

Sloman & Vives (2022)

A re-examination of the illusion of explanatory depth as a way to reduce political extremism, by one of the authors of the 2013 paper. Cited here beside it rather than instead of it.

Corrects a popular claim

The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes' Steadfast Factual Adherence

Wood & Porter (2019)

This one corrects a popular claim rather than making one: the backfire effect — the idea that correcting somebody hardens their belief — proved elusive across thirty thousand participants. People mostly updated toward the facts.

Every source, most-relied-on first

48 papers

Ordered by how much of the curriculum would have to change if the paper turned out to be wrong.

Clinical practice

A Cognitive Model of Social Phobia

Clark & Wells (1995)

Relied on in 21 places

Research

It Doesn't Hurt to Ask: Question-Asking Increases Liking

Huang, Yeomans, Brooks, Minson & Gino (2017)

Relied on in 15 places · 5 stated limits

Research

Beautiful Mess Effect: Self–Other Differences in Evaluation of Showing Vulnerability

Bruk, Scholl & Bless (2018)

Relied on in 11 places · 2 stated limits

Clinical practice

Maximizing Exposure Therapy: An Inhibitory Learning Approach

Craske, Treanor, Conway, Zbozinek & Vervliet (2014)

Relied on in 11 places · 4 stated limits

Research

If You Need Help, Just Ask: Underestimating Compliance With Direct Requests for Help

Flynn & Lake (2008)

Relied on in 11 places · 8 stated limits

Research

Duration Neglect in Retrospective Evaluations of Affective Episodes; When More Pain Is Preferred to Less

Fredrickson & Kahneman (1993); Kahneman, Fredrickson, Schreiber & Redelmeier (1993)

Relied on in 11 places · 10 stated limits

Research

Post-Event Processing in Social Anxiety

Rachman, Grüter-Andrew & Shafran (2000)

Relied on in 9 places · 7 stated limits

Research

The Spotlight Effect in Social Judgment

Gilovich, Medvec & Savitsky (2000)

Relied on in 7 places · 4 stated limits

Research

The Liking Gap in Conversations: Do People Like Us More Than We Think?

Boothby, Cooney, Sandstrom & Clark (2018)

Relied on in 6 places · 2 stated limits

Research

Perceived Partner Responsiveness as an Organizing Construct in the Study of Intimacy and Closeness

Reis, Clark & Holmes (2004)

Relied on in 6 places · 2 stated limits

Research

Mistakenly Seeking Solitude

Epley & Schroeder (2014)

Relied on in 5 places · 3 stated limits

Research

Overly Shallow?: Miscalibrated Expectations Create a Barrier to Deeper Conversation

Kardas, Kumar & Epley (2022)

Relied on in 5 places · 1 stated limit

Research

Couples' Shared Participation in Novel and Arousing Activities and Experienced Relationship Quality

Aron, Norman, Aron, McKenna & Heyman (2000)

Relied on in 4 places · 2 stated limits

ResearchContested

The Effect of a Pratfall on Increasing Interpersonal Attractiveness

Aronson, Willerman & Floyd (1966)

Relied on in 4 places · 3 stated limits

Research

Pupil Dilation as an Index of Preferred Mutual Gaze Duration

Binetti, Harrison, Coutrot, Johnston & Mareschal (2016)

Relied on in 4 places · 2 stated limits

Research

Daily Marital Interactions and Positive Affect During Marital Conflict Among Newlywed Couples

Driver & Gottman (2004)

Relied on in 4 places · 4 stated limits

Research

Just Teasing: A Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Review

Keltner, Capps, Kring, Young & Heerey (2001)

Relied on in 4 places · 2 stated limits

Research

The Experimental Generation of Interpersonal Closeness

Aron, Melinat, Aron, Vallone & Bator (1997)

Relied on in 3 places · 3 stated limits

Research

(Mis)Understanding Our Influence Over Others: A Review of the Underestimated-Compliance Effect

Bohns (2016)

Relied on in 3 places · 2 stated limits

Research

Perspective Mistaking: Accurately Understanding the Mind of Another Requires Getting Perspective, Not Taking Perspective

Eyal, Steffel & Epley (2018)

Relied on in 3 places · 2 stated limits

Research

The Humanizing Voice: Speech Reveals, and Text Conceals, a More Thoughtful Mind in the Midst of Disagreement

Schroeder, Kardas & Epley (2017)

Relied on in 3 places · 3 stated limits

Research

Disclosing Information About the Self Is Intrinsically Rewarding

Tamir & Mitchell (2012)

Relied on in 3 places · 2 stated limits

Research

Fast Response Times Signal Social Connection in Conversation

Templeton, Chang, Reynolds, Cone LeBeaumont & Wheatley (2022)

Relied on in 3 places · 3 stated limits

Research

Conversational Receptiveness: Improving Engagement with Opposing Views

Yeomans, Minson, Collins, Chen & Gino (2020)

Relied on in 3 places · 1 stated limit

Research

A Little Thanks Goes a Long Way: Explaining Why Gratitude Expressions Motivate Prosocial Behavior

Grant & Gino (2010)

Relied on in 2 places · 2 stated limits

Research

Egocentrism Over E-Mail: Can We Communicate as Well as We Think?

Kruger, Epley, Parker & Ng (2005)

Relied on in 2 places · 2 stated limits

Research

Undervaluing Gratitude: Expressers Misunderstand the Consequences of Showing Appreciation

Kumar & Epley (2018)

Relied on in 2 places · 1 stated limit

Research

The Sound of Intellect: Speech Reveals a Thoughtful Mind, Increasing a Job Candidate's Appeal

Schroeder & Epley (2015)

Relied on in 2 places · 2 stated limits

ResearchContested

“Playing Hard to Get”: Understanding an Elusive Phenomenon

Walster, Walster, Piliavin & Schmidt (1973)

Relied on in 2 places · 1 stated limit

Research

Durably Reducing Transphobia: A Field Experiment on Door-to-Door Canvassing

Broockman & Kalla (2016)

Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit

Research

Get Excited: Reappraising Pre-Performance Anxiety as Excitement

Brooks (2014)

Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit

From the canon

History of My Life

Casanova, Histoire de ma vie (written 1789–98)

Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit

ResearchContested

A Multi-Lab Test of the Facial Feedback Hypothesis; Registered Replication Report: Strack, Martin & Stepper (1988)

Coles et al., Many Smiles Collaboration (2022); Wagenmakers et al. (2016)

Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit

ResearchContested

Political Extremism Is Supported by an Illusion of Understanding

Fernbach, Rogers, Fox & Sloman (2013)

Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit

Research

Online Pauses and Silence: Chronemic Expectancy Violations in Written Computer-Mediated Communication

Kalman & Rafaeli (2011)

Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit

Research

Anticipation and the Valuation of Delayed Consumption

Loewenstein (1987)

Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit

Our reading

The Psychology of Curiosity: A Review and Reinterpretation

Loewenstein (1994)

Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit

Research

Eavesdropping on Happiness: Well-Being Is Related to Having Less Small Talk and More Substantive Conversations

Mehl, Vazire, Holleran & Clark (2010)

Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit

Our reading

The iPhone Effect: The Quality of In-Person Social Interactions in the Presence of Mobile Devices

Misra, Cheng, Genevie & Yuan (2014)

Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit

Research

Exposure Effects in the Classroom: The Development of Affinity Among Students

Moreland & Beach (1992)

Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit

Research

Familiarity Does Indeed Promote Attraction in Live Interaction

Reis, Maniaci, Caprariello, Eastwick & Finkel (2011)

Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit

Research

Social Interactions and Well-Being: The Surprising Power of Weak Ties

Sandstrom & Dunn (2014)

Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit

Research

Talking to Strangers: A Week-Long Intervention Reduces Psychological Barriers to Social Connection

Sandstrom, Boothby & Cooney (2022)

Relied on in 1 place

Research

Is Efficiency Overrated? Minimal Social Interactions Lead to Belonging and Positive Affect

Sandstrom & Dunn (2014)

Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit

ResearchCorrects

Is Political Extremism Supported by an Illusion of Understanding?

Sloman & Vives (2022)

Relied on in 1 place

Research

Alcohol Myopia: Its Prized and Dangerous Effects

Steele & Josephs (1990)

Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit

ResearchCorrects

The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes' Steadfast Factual Adherence

Wood & Porter (2019)

Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit

Research

Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure; Exposure and Affect: Overview and Meta-Analysis of Research, 1968–1987

Zajonc (1968); Bornstein (1989)

Relied on in 1 place · 1 stated limit

What this is for

Suaviq is a nightly practice for charm and social confidence: one short lesson, one real-world exercise, ninety seconds to put the evening down. Everything above is the reasoning underneath it, published in full because a claim you cannot check is worth nothing.

Every page here is free to read, link to and quote, including by machines — the citation and the DOI are on each one, and we would rather you went to the paper than to us. If you are writing about this and something looks wrong, tell us at contact@suaviq.com and we will correct it or say why we disagree.

Read the free half of the curriculum

Sixty exercises, open, no account.