SUAVIQNight one
← The evidence registry
Research

Perspective Mistaking: Accurately Understanding the Mind of Another Requires Getting Perspective, Not Taking Perspective

Eyal, Steffel & Epley (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4)

Relied on in 3 places across the academy · 2 stated limits

Read the paper ↗

What it found

Across 25 experiments, being instructed to take another person's perspective did not reliably improve accuracy about them — and sometimes reduced it while increasing confidence. What worked was getting the perspective: asking.

Checking your understanding out loud is the “getting perspective” move that improved accuracy where imagining their view did not.

Across twenty-five experiments, actively imagining another person's perspective failed to improve accuracy about what they were thinking; asking them did.

What it does not show

Twenty-five experiments on accuracy about another person's thoughts and feelings. It shows that imagining their perspective does not improve accuracy, and that asking them does.

And where we carry it further

This corrects Carnegie rather than confirming him. Imagining their view is the part that fails; asking is the part that works.

Which is why this exercise ends in saying it to them rather than in deciding it for them.

Where we rely on it

3 places in the academy. If this paper turned out to be wrong, this is the list that would have to change. Some of the instructions below are part of Gold; none of the findings are.

Cited alongside it

Papers that sit under the same topics and films. Not a claim that they agree with each other — only that the same exercises lean on both.

Research

A real study. We tell you what it found, how many people were in it, and what it can't prove.

Free to read, link to and quote. If we have carried this paper further than it goes, say so at contact@suaviq.com — corrections to this registry are the most useful mail we get.