Is Efficiency Overrated? Minimal Social Interactions Lead to Belonging and Positive Affect
Sandstrom & Dunn (2014) · Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(4)
Relied on in 1 place across the academy · 1 stated limit
What it found
People sent into a coffee shop and asked to have a brief genuine exchange with the barista — eye contact, a smile, a short conversation — left in a better mood than those told to be as efficient as possible, with early evidence the difference ran through feeling they belonged.
What it does not show
A single field experiment at one coffee shop, with mood measured on the way out. The authors themselves call the belonging mechanism initial evidence. It is about a stranger behind a counter, not about somebody you will see again.
And where we carry it further
A single visit with a member of staff, measured minutes later. It says nothing about the other regular across the room.
Where we rely on it
1 place in the academy. If this paper turned out to be wrong, this is the list that would have to change. Some of the instructions below are part of Gold; none of the findings are.
In the curriculum · 1
Cited alongside it
Papers that sit under the same topics and films. Not a claim that they agree with each other — only that the same exercises lean on both.
(Mis)Understanding Our Influence Over Others: A Review of the Underestimated-Compliance Effect
Bohns (2016)Maximizing Exposure Therapy: An Inhibitory Learning Approach
Craske, Treanor, Conway, Zbozinek & Vervliet (2014)The Spotlight Effect in Social Judgment
Gilovich, Medvec & Savitsky (2000)It Doesn't Hurt to Ask: Question-Asking Increases Liking
Huang, Yeomans, Brooks, Minson & Gino (2017)Exposure Effects in the Classroom: The Development of Affinity Among Students
Moreland & Beach (1992)Familiarity Does Indeed Promote Attraction in Live Interaction
Reis, Maniaci, Caprariello, Eastwick & Finkel (2011)Research
A real study. We tell you what it found, how many people were in it, and what it can't prove.
Free to read, link to and quote. If we have carried this paper further than it goes, say so at contact@suaviq.com — corrections to this registry are the most useful mail we get.