Skip to content
SUAVIQ
← All the evidence
Research

Pupil Dilation as an Index of Preferred Mutual Gaze Duration

Binetti, Harrison, Coutrot, Johnston & Mareschal (2016) · Royal Society Open Science, 3(7)

We use this paper in 4 places in the academy · 2 stated limits

Read the paper ↗

What the study found

Nearly 500 people were tested. On average they were comfortable with about 3.3 seconds of eye contact. That is longer than an anxious glance and much shorter than a stare.

What the study cannot prove

The study used faces on a screen, not live conversation, and preferences varied a lot between people. 3.3 seconds is an average, not a target.

Limits we note on the exercises

The study used faces on a screen, not live conversation, and people's preferences varied a lot.

The study used filmed faces on screens, not live conversation.

Where we use it

We use this paper in 4 places in the academy. If the paper turned out to be wrong, we would have to change everything in this list. Some of the exercise instructions below are part of Gold. You can read every finding for free.

Other papers used in the same places

These papers are used in the same topics and videos as this one. That does not mean the papers agree with each other. It only means that the same exercises use both.

Research

A real study. We tell you what it found, how many people were in it, and what it can't prove.

You are free to read, link to and quote this page. If we claim more than this paper shows, please tell us at contact@suaviq.com. We read every correction, and corrections help us more than any other email.