Disclosing Information About the Self Is Intrinsically Rewarding
Tamir & Mitchell (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(21)
Relied on in 3 places across the academy · 2 stated limits
What it found
Talking about oneself engaged the brain's reward regions, and across five studies people gave up money for the chance to do it.
Self-disclosure is intrinsically rewarding — people will forgo money for the chance to do it.
What it does not show
Neuroimaging plus laboratory choices about money. It establishes that self-disclosure is rewarding to the person disclosing, not that quieter people are better liked.
And where we carry it further
Neuroimaging plus behavioural choice, in the lab. It establishes that self-disclosure is rewarding, not that quieter people are better liked.
It shows talking is rewarding for them, not that silence persuades.
Where we rely on it
3 places in the academy. If this paper turned out to be wrong, this is the list that would have to change. Some of the instructions below are part of Gold; none of the findings are.
In the curriculum · 2
In the films · 1
Cited alongside it
Papers that sit under the same topics and films. Not a claim that they agree with each other — only that the same exercises lean on both.
A Little Thanks Goes a Long Way: Explaining Why Gratitude Expressions Motivate Prosocial Behavior
Grant & Gino (2010)It Doesn't Hurt to Ask: Question-Asking Increases Liking
Huang, Yeomans, Brooks, Minson & Gino (2017)A Cognitive Model of Social Phobia
Clark & Wells (1995)A Multi-Lab Test of the Facial Feedback Hypothesis; Registered Replication Report: Strack, Martin & Stepper (1988)
Coles et al., Many Smiles Collaboration (2022); Wagenmakers et al. (2016)Daily Marital Interactions and Positive Affect During Marital Conflict Among Newlywed Couples
Driver & Gottman (2004)Perspective Mistaking: Accurately Understanding the Mind of Another Requires Getting Perspective, Not Taking Perspective
Eyal, Steffel & Epley (2018)Research
A real study. We tell you what it found, how many people were in it, and what it can't prove.
Free to read, link to and quote. If we have carried this paper further than it goes, say so at contact@suaviq.com — corrections to this registry are the most useful mail we get.