Skip to content
SUAVIQ
← All the evidence
Research

Mistakenly Seeking Solitude

Epley & Schroeder (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5)

We use this paper in 5 places in the academy · 3 stated limits

Read the paper ↗

What the study found

In nine experiments with more than 800 commuters, people who were told to talk to a stranger enjoyed the journey more than people who sat alone. Another group had predicted the opposite.

In nine experiments, people who were told to talk to a stranger had a better experience than people who were told to sit alone. Other participants had predicted the reverse. Nobody who tried a conversation reported being turned away.

What the study cannot prove

The study was done with commuters on Chicago trains and buses. It did not test other cultures, other settings, or what happens when you do it repeatedly.

Limits we note on the exercises

Most of it was done on trains and buses in Chicago. Nobody has tested whether it holds in other cultures.

The study was done on trains and buses in Chicago, not at parties.

The studies were done on public transport and in cabs, mostly in Chicago. The effect has been repeated many times, but a commuter train is a low-pressure place where people already share a situation.

Where we use it

We use this paper in 5 places in the academy. If the paper turned out to be wrong, we would have to change everything in this list. Some of the exercise instructions below are part of Gold. You can read every finding for free.

Other papers used in the same places

These papers are used in the same topics and videos as this one. That does not mean the papers agree with each other. It only means that the same exercises use both.

Research

A real study. We tell you what it found, how many people were in it, and what it can't prove.

You are free to read, link to and quote this page. If we claim more than this paper shows, please tell us at contact@suaviq.com. We read every correction, and corrections help us more than any other email.