SUAVIQNight one
← The evidence registry
Research

The Humanizing Voice: Speech Reveals, and Text Conceals, a More Thoughtful Mind in the Midst of Disagreement

Schroeder, Kardas & Epley (2017) · Psychological Science, 28(12)

Relied on in 3 places across the academy · 3 stated limits

Read the paper ↗

What it found

When people met an opinion they disagreed with, hearing it spoken rather than reading the identical words led them to judge the holder as more thoughtful, more rational and more human.

Hearing a view rather than reading it made the person holding it seem more thoughtful and more human.

Hearing an opposing opinion spoken rather than reading the identical words led people to judge the holder as more thoughtful and more human, and to dehumanise them less.

What it does not show

Political and social disagreement between strangers, delivered as prepared arguments. It is not a study of a text argument with somebody you are seeing.

And where we carry it further

Tested on political and social disagreement between strangers, not on a text argument with somebody you are seeing.

Disagreement between strangers again. Applying it to a misread text is our extension.

Political and social disagreement between strangers. Applying it to a text argument with somebody you are seeing is our extension.

Where we rely on it

3 places in the academy. If this paper turned out to be wrong, this is the list that would have to change.

Cited alongside it

Papers that sit under the same topics and films. Not a claim that they agree with each other — only that the same exercises lean on both.

Research

A real study. We tell you what it found, how many people were in it, and what it can't prove.

Free to read, link to and quote. If we have carried this paper further than it goes, say so at contact@suaviq.com — corrections to this registry are the most useful mail we get.