Lesson 10 · 1:24
The Carnegie Method
How to Win Friends and Influence People has sold in the tens of millions and is quoted far more often than it is read.
Practise it
10 exercises, in order
The practical version of this video, climbing from the ones that cost nothing to the ones that take real nerve.
Open the exercisesChapters · 4
Lesson 10 · 1:24
The Carnegie Method
How to Win Friends and Influence People has sold in the tens of millions and is quoted far more often than it is read. It also contains no data at all. Here is what survived ninety years of psychologists testing it, what did not, and the line where the whole method stops being charm and becomes sales.
The problem
The most quoted line has almost nothing behind it
Remember and use a person's name is the principle everyone can quote from the book. We could find no solid evidence that using someone's name in conversation increases liking.
That is an absence rather than a refutation — nobody has shown it works, and nobody has shown it does not. But it is also the single most transparent technique in the book, and everyone has met the salesman who does it four times a sentence.
The move
Keep the memory, drop the performance
Say the name once when you learn it, because saying it is how you fix it. Then leave it alone. Remembering somebody's name a week later is worth something; deploying it mid-sentence is worth less than nothing.
Our reading. This is Carnegie's most-quoted claim and one of his least supported; we teach the memory half and drop the performance half.
Do this todaySay the name once when you learn it. Then stop using it.
Move one
Say the appreciation out loud
Tell one person, specifically, what they did that you valued. Not “thanks” — the actual thing, named.
This is the principle of his that the evidence supports most directly, and the mechanism the researchers identified was feeling socially valued rather than feeling more capable.
The move
Name the thing, not the feeling
“Thank you for handling that call — you stayed calm when I would not have” is the exercise. “Thanks, you're great” is not, because it gives them nothing to recognise themselves in.
When a director thanked university fundraisers for their work, the number of calls they made the following week rose by roughly 50%, an effect carried by feeling socially valued rather than by feeling more capable.
Limits — A workplace motivation study, not a study of charm. The mechanism — feeling valued — is what is being borrowed.
Do this todayTell one person tonight what they did that you valued.
Move two
Let them talk twice as long
In one conversation, aim to speak for about a third of it. You are giving them something they enjoy more than anything you were about to say.
Across five studies, talking about oneself engaged the brain's reward regions, and people gave up money for the chance to do it.
The move
A third is a target, not a rule
The number is there to make the imbalance deliberate rather than accidental. Counting your sentences through a whole conversation would defeat the point; noticing once, halfway through, that you have taken most of it is the whole exercise.
Talking about oneself engaged the brain's reward regions, and across five studies people gave up money for the chance to do it.
Limits — Neuroimaging plus behavioural choice, in the lab. It establishes that self-disclosure is rewarding, not that quieter people are better liked.
Do this todayOne conversation where you speak for about a third of it.
Move three
Decide who you are curious about before you arrive
Pick one person in advance and decide to find out something real about them. Interest you chose beforehand survives the moment your nerve goes.
The mechanism the question research identifies is perceived responsiveness: asking — follow-ups especially — increased liking across chat studies and speed dating.
The move
One person, one thing to find out
The decision has to be specific enough to act on while you are nervous. “Be more curious” collapses at the door; “find out how Anna ended up in that job” survives it.
Asking questions — follow-ups especially — increased liking across chat studies and speed dating, and the mechanism the authors identify is perceived responsiveness.
Do this todayBefore the next event, pick one person and one thing to find out.
The other half
Where we part company with Carnegie
Every technique on this page works on somebody whether or not you like them. That is exactly what makes the book dangerous, and Carnegie's own framing of the endgame — arousing in the other person an eager want — is the point where charm becomes sales.
The replacement is simple and it costs you the advantage: when you want something from someone, say plainly what is in it for them, and if there is nothing, say that instead. The difference is whether the other person can see the transaction.
One more correction, because it is his most repeated advice. Carnegie claimed that arranging your face changes your mood. A 17-lab registered replication failed to reproduce the classic result in 2016, and a 26-lab study in 2022 found only small effects — weakest of all with the unobtrusive task. Smile because it tells somebody you are approachable, not because we can promise it will make you happy.
Your note
Private to you, always
Source note
Where this comes from
The principles are our paraphrases of Carnegie (1936), not his sentences. The three moves are exercises 02, 06 and 03 of Topic 07 and carry that topic's evidence: Grant & Gino on thanked fundraisers, Tamir & Mitchell on self-disclosure, Huang et al. on questions. Each is a study of something adjacent to charm rather than of charm itself, and each caveat is stated beside its finding. The two places we contradict him — the name and the smile — are the places where the later evidence is absent or against him, and both are on this page rather than left out of it.
Practise it
10 exercises, in order
The practical version of this video, climbing from the ones that cost nothing to the ones that take real nerve.
Open the exercisesChapters
Source note
Where this comes from
The principles are our paraphrases of Carnegie (1936), not his sentences. The three moves are exercises 02, 06 and 03 of Topic 07 and carry that topic's evidence: Grant & Gino on thanked fundraisers, Tamir & Mitchell on self-disclosure, Huang et al. on questions. Each is a study of something adjacent to charm rather than of charm itself, and each caveat is stated beside its finding. The two places we contradict him — the name and the smile — are the places where the later evidence is absent or against him, and both are on this page rather than left out of it.